Would anyone round here enable Glasgow’s vulnerable to be manipulated because they are an easy target? Surely not. We have an elected city council charged with some tricky financial balancing acts in these times; could they become targets themselves by operators who can provide a better service and for less? On the surface it sounds like it would make sense to follow up on such claims but you have to think who are the best con artists you can think of? The ones you’d least suspect to leave you with no options and call that self direction.
Consider an air of respectability, a worthy aim, a charitable status and demonstrations of justification for public funding, funding from your pocket and from mine. Consider a long history of providing a service for vulnerable adults that was second to none. I say was because it clearly was back in the day when family members got together to make something better than there was for the vulnerable loved ones in their care. Their concern for what might happen to them after they were no longer there created something to be proud of and something that did what it was set up for.
Decades later this shifts to the control of a group with the promise of better care, better management and greater financial clout to ensure this continues. This is the point where care and commerce become very uncomfortable bedfellows. If you care do you do it for the money? Aren’t the ones caring enough to do the caring left behind as the money rolls in to benefit the rest who talk about caring? Continue reading